Your Perfect Assignment is Just a Click Away

Starting at $8.00 per Page

100% Original, Plagiarism Free, Customized to Your instructions!

glass
pen
clip
papers
heaphones

GCN Healthcare Informatics & Technology Exploration RFID & EHR Discussion

GCN Healthcare Informatics & Technology Exploration RFID & EHR Discussion

Question Description

For this assignment, you will locate an article, report, or credible webpage that provides information or statistics on one of the topics listed below. You will then use this article/report/webpage to thoughtfully respond to the questions in the worksheet. (USLO 11.1)

Instructions

1. Select one of the topics below to explore for this assignment.

  • RFID (Radio Frequency Identification Devices)
  • Smart card technology with personal medical history embedded
  • Emerging informatics roles in the clinical environment
  • Electronic Medical Records/Electronic Health Records
  • Personal Health Records
  • Interoperability/National Health Information Network
  • The HITECH Act
  • Telemedicine/Telehealth/Telenursing

2. Find a credible article, report, or webpage using the web or Galen Library databases that relates to your selected topic.

3. Download the Week 11 Assignment Worksheet Links to an external site.and respond to the questions using your selected article/report/webpage.

3. Save your work as lastname_firstname_unit11.docx.

Your submission this week will be a Word document (.doc or .docx).

Aligned USLOs:

11.1 Describe technology in healthcare settings.

Rubric

Week 11 Assignment – Healthcare Informatics and Technology Exploration Grading Rubric

Week 11 Assignment – Healthcare Informatics and Technology Exploration Grading Rubric

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRelevance of response to Question #1

5.0 pts

Acceptable

Response states which topic related to healthcare informatics the student chose for the assignment.

0.0 pts

Unacceptable

Response does not identify a topic. Or the topic identified is not related to healthcare informatics. Or assignment was not submitted.

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAccuracy of response to Question #2

5.0 pts

Acceptable

Student correctly identifies where the resource was located.

0.0 pts

Unacceptable

Student does not correctly identify where the resource was located. Or assignment was not submitted.

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLink provided in response to Question #3

5.0 pts

Acceptable

Student provides a functional link to the article, report, or webpage used for the assignment.

0.0 pts

Unacceptable

Student does not provide a functional link to the article, report, or webpage used for the assignment. Or assignment was not submitted.

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAccuracy of response to Question #4

10.0 pts

Acceptable

Student correctly identifies the author(s) of the selected source and their qualifications.

6.0 pts

Partially Complete

Student correctly identifies the author(s) of the selected source but does not outline their qualifications.

0.0 pts

Unacceptable

Student does not correctly identify the author(s) of the selected source or their qualifications. Or assignment was not submitted.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuality of response to Question #5

10.0 pts

Acceptable

Student thoroughly explains why the source was selected and what about the source caught the student’s attention.

6.0 pts

Partially Complete

Student vaguely explains why the source was selected but does not outline what about the source caught the student’s attention.

0.0 pts

Unacceptable

Student does not explain why the source was selected and what about the source caught the student’s attention. Or assignment was not submitted.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuality of response to Question #6 & word countview longer description

threshold: 20.0 pts

20.0 ptsSummary of the source is at least 100 words and thoroughly discusses the student’s findings from reading the source.

12.0 ptsSummary of the source does not meet the 100-word length requirement but still discusses the student’s findings from reading the source.

0.0 ptsSummary of the source does not meet the 100-word length requirement and does not thoroughly discuss the student’s findings from reading the source. Or assignment was not submitted.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuality of response to Question #7 & word countview longer description

threshold: 20.0 pts

20.0 ptsReflection on the source is at least 100 words and thoroughly discusses the potential impact of the information presented on the student’s role as a nurse.

12.0 ptsReflection on the source does not meet the 100-word length requirement but still discusses the potential impact of the information presented on the student’s role as a nurse.

0.0 ptsReflection on the source does not meet the 100-word length requirement and does not thoroughly discuss the potential impact of the information presented on the student’s role as a nurse. Or assignment was not submitted.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCredibility of source selected

20.0 pts

Acceptable

Student selected a credible article, report, or webpage to use for the assignment.

12.0 pts

Partially Complete

There are minor issues apparent with the credibility of the source selected for the assignment based on credibility indicators discussed earlier in the course.

0.0 pts

Unacceptable

There are significant issues apparent with the credibility of the source selected for the assignment. Or assignment was not submitted.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSpelling, grammar, & mechanics

5.0 pts

Acceptable

Responses contain 0-2 errors in spelling, grammar, and mechanics.

3.0 pts

Partially Complete

Responses contain 3-5 errors in spelling, grammar, and mechanics.

0.0 pts

Unacceptable

Responses contain 6 or more errors in spelling, grammar, and mechanics.

5.0 pts

Total Points: 100.0

PreviousNext


"Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, guaranteeing you A results."

Order Solution Now

Our Service Charter


1. Professional & Expert Writers: Eminence Papers only hires the best. Our writers are specially selected and recruited, after which they undergo further training to perfect their skills for specialization purposes. Moreover, our writers are holders of masters and Ph.D. degrees. They have impressive academic records, besides being native English speakers.

2. Top Quality Papers: Our customers are always guaranteed of papers that exceed their expectations. All our writers have +5 years of experience. This implies that all papers are written by individuals who are experts in their fields. In addition, the quality team reviews all the papers before sending them to the customers.

3. Plagiarism-Free Papers: All papers provided by Eminence Papers are written from scratch. Appropriate referencing and citation of key information are followed. Plagiarism checkers are used by the Quality assurance team and our editors just to double-check that there are no instances of plagiarism.

4. Timely Delivery: Time wasted is equivalent to a failed dedication and commitment. Eminence Papers are known for the timely delivery of any pending customer orders. Customers are well informed of the progress of their papers to ensure they keep track of what the writer is providing before the final draft is sent for grading.

5. Affordable Prices: Our prices are fairly structured to fit in all groups. Any customer willing to place their assignments with us can do so at very affordable prices. In addition, our customers enjoy regular discounts and bonuses.

6. 24/7 Customer Support: At Eminence Papers, we have put in place a team of experts who answer all customer inquiries promptly. The best part is the ever-availability of the team. Customers can make inquiries anytime.