|Media and the Human Service Agenda (Original HW Post)|
Chapter 18 of the text takes an aggressive adversarial role in accomplishing the human services agenda. Do you agree with this approach? Why or why not? If not, what approach do you suggest and why? Support your discussion with a minimum of one scholarly, peer-reviewed source that was published within the last five years and cited according to APA guidelines. Respond to two of your classmates posts.
Classmate #1 Silver
Chapter 18 provided informative details that are beneficial. Health and Human Service professionals’ participation in the political process is essential, but can lack effectiveness when not promoting the welfare of individuals as a group that is lobbying for the better good. As stated by Schmid & Almog-Bar (2020, p. 268) “Forming and sustaining partnerships is complex, and includes various aspects, such as organizational and structural aspects as well as aspects related to human capital.” Meaning, Human Service professional experts can have their most prominent effect within coordinated gatherings instead of being solo. This is presumably in light of the fact that public strategy improvement isn’t also characterized or too advanced as legislative issues. Truth be told, the government appears lack specific interest in improvementthey have no vision of where they need their organization to be or how to arrive. This is the same as private companies or associations that have no approach or arranging system for the future yet just continue doing what they have consistently done in spite of improving the citizens of America’s way of life.
Human Service instructors should get together with those within political power. Most teachers come from one of the customary callings of social work, science, directing, etc. Joining those expert associations just as backing associations, for example, emotional wellness affiliations, relationship for hindered residents, and public government assistance affiliations, can improve the goal the agenda of getting bills passed that benefit the health industry for the clients.
Meeting with those within the political office and learning their viewpoints about situations on human assistance issues is an important step. At legislative and official levels this turns out to be more troublesome and is best done through set up associations. On the off chance that it is preposterous to expect to arrive with the political figure and talk with their mission staff people to resolve issues. Sending letters to clients seeking human services and requesting them to express concerns is an option to laws being changed that benefits the citizens and not just those in political power.
Schmid, H., & Almog-Bar, M. (2020). Predictors of success and failure in cross-sectoral partnerships in nonprofit human services: Reflections and Challenges. Journal of Health & Human Services Administration, 43(3), 268287. https://doi-org.proxy-library.ashford.e
Classmate # 2 Amira
Hello Classmates and Professor Gibson!
Being that human service educators and workers work or have worked directly in the Human Services field, understand clients & vulnerable populations needs/complications/struggles/challenges, and are the ones supporting and striving for their clients best interest, its crucial that HS educators/workers be involved in public policy and politics around human services. Their expertise in and of the field should make them forerunners in working with government officials to help and assist with policy development, decisions, and changes (Harris et al., 2004). I agree with the current aggressive adversarial role in accomplishing the human services agenda as it still strongly applies to the field today, and with the country and everything in it consistently changing, defining, refining, and improving policy-making and procedures calls for human service educators/workers input. On top of this, Kutchins & Kutchins (1987) states that human service workers can become effective advocates by employing the elements of the adversary system in a methodical way to help clients achieve their goals (p. 3). With the federal, state, and or county governments providing most of the funding for human service delivery and educational programs around human services, changes in federal law, regulations, and budgets affect state services in these areas (NCSL, 2021, para. 1). This is why it is vital that human service workers be involved and apart of policy development/changes as their opinions, suggestions, feedback, knowledge, and input are duly needed. In order to address and tackle the human service field/program issues, challenges faced by vulnerable populations, areas in which strongly call for human service support, and most important federal legislation and regulations that pertain to human services, workers and educators should follow a public policy process when working with government officials. This process includes the following steps, such as regulation writing (developing policies, procedures, regulations, and so on), being advisories to public and voluntary agencies, special task groups and studies (specific studies of problems and proposals on how to address them), networking with other organizations, participating in media activities (writing letters to media and or making an appearance on media/radio), and inviting agency officials and policymakers to participate in human service programs (Harris et al., 2004). By human service educators and workers following and implementing these process steps, they are able to play a primary role in greatly bringing needed change to the field and policies surrounding human services.
Harris et al. (2004) discuses politics and states that participation in the political process is a more directed, promotional, and often adversarial process of working for the election of specific candidates or the enactment of specific pieces of legislation by the legislative body and then getting the responsible executive officer to sign the legislation (p. 261). Human service educators and workers must stay up to date and educated about politics, legislative procedures/bills, committee hearings, and organizations supporting their cause(s), in order to have their voice heard and effectively contribute to policymaking and procedures.
Harris, H., Maloney, D., & Rother, F. (2004). Human services: Contemporary issues and trends (3rd ed.). Boston: Pearson. ISBN: 0205327702. Retrieved from https://www.vitalsource.com (Links to an external site.)
Kutchins, H. and Kutchins, S. (1987, September). Advocacy and the Adversary system. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1826&context=jssw (Links to an external site.)
NCSL. (2021). Human Services Federal issues overview. https://www.ncsl.org/research/human-services/human-services-federal-issues-overview.aspx (Links to an external site.).
"Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, guaranteeing you A results."