Your Perfect Assignment is Just a Click Away

Starting at $8.00 per Page

100% Original, Plagiarism Free, Customized to Your instructions!

glass
pen
clip
papers
heaphones

Privacy Controversies Country Security Discussion

Privacy Controversies Country Security Discussion

Question Description

DISCUSSION TOPIC

Many TV shows depict law enforcement personnel accessing readily accessible databases that contain all types of records about individuals –records about everything from address to telephone records to finances, insurance, and criminal history. The information you share with your bank, doctor, insurance agent, the TSA, ancestry kit companies, and on social media can make your life an open book. Here are some questions to address as you reflect on this:
1. Are you comfortable with giving away some of your privacy for increased security? Why or why not? How far would you let the government go in examining people’s private lives?
2. How much access should we have to certain aspects of others’ private lives? For example, should States share criminal databases? But should a database of people paroled or released for crimes be made public? Why or why not?

Response 1

1. Are you comfortable with giving away some of your privacy for increased security? Why or why not? How far would you let the government go in examining people’s private lives?

I am comfortable sacrificing some freedom for security. The reason behind this is technology, which is advancing more and more everyday. For example, most people believe that allowing the government to listen in on all your calls and texts is wrong, unconstitutional, and above all an invasion of privacy. I would have to agree, as I don’t believe law abiding citizens should be so vulnerable to unknown surveillance. However, agencies like the FBI for example have been able to stop major terrorist attacks and plots, simply by intercepting internet signals such as emails,calls, or text messages. In this case, I believe the government would be doing well by invading the privacy of these individuals, therefor protecting the public safety as a result.
2. How much access should we have to certain aspects of others’ private lives? For example, should States share criminal databases? But should a database of people paroled or released for crimes be made public? Why or why not?

I believe that states should share criminal databases, however only some should be publicized. For instance, in the United States we have virtual criminal data bases for anyone registered as a sex offender. Anyone who wants to check their area for any possible sex offenders can just log on and enter their zip code. I think this is one example of how publicizing some individuals personal information or past could benefit society.

Resources:

Prescott, J. J., and Sonja. “The Case for Expunging Criminal Records.” The New York Times, The New York Times, 21 Mar. 2019, www.nytimes.com/2019/03/20/opinion/expunge-criminal-records.html.

NOTE;

Need a response for this discussion

Response 2

Trading personal privacy for security has been a growing conversation due to the evolvement of technology. Everyday there are new developments that allow the public to reveal more personal data and has resulted in this data being used for certain agendas. Personally, I do understand the concept behind trading a bit of privacy for security purposes. It is the price we pay for wanting to live our lives online. However, the problem is that there is this notion that privacy is a privilege or nonessential and because it is supposed to be for security purposes, it somehow makes it okay. There seems to be a misconstruction that personal privacy and increased security cannot coincide. For example, we allow our phones to track our locations for app purposes and in turn it releases health information to random individuals around us without our knowledge or permission. There are reasonings for this to be okay though like health care access, insurance access, banking etc. I think I would be comfortable with the government examining in private lives if it could be proved to be a lawful purpose (criminal investigations) and there were effective measures to ensure it was being used for only that.

As far as how much access we should have to others’ private lives definitely depends on the situation at hand. I think it is appropriate for States to share criminal databases if it involves sexual incidents or murder charges. I believe those are cases where the public should know because not every single time does someone get out or are on parole for something and do not commit that crime again. It should be a personal choice to not live near a person who has committed that crime. However, if the justice system fairly gives a sentence then that person should be protected from possible harassment. As far as other crimes, I do not see the reason for that to be shared. It could create issues with personal development of that person. I also think that would cross the line of abusing the power of having access to that information. Another example I could think of is law enforcement using license plate readers and being able to figure out who it belongs to for a purposeful use. Yet, using that same license plate reader to be able to track any vehicle in real time for no specific reason. I think the concept of trading privacy for security makes sense while using it for lawful purposes, but it always gets taken too far and creates a skewed view of what it means to trade privacy for security.

Evans, J. (2018, May 06). Personal privacy vs. public security. Retrieved from https://techcrunch.com/2018/05/06/personal-privacy…

NOTE;

Need a response for this discussion


"Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, guaranteeing you A results."

Order Solution Now

Our Service Charter


1. Professional & Expert Writers: Eminence Papers only hires the best. Our writers are specially selected and recruited, after which they undergo further training to perfect their skills for specialization purposes. Moreover, our writers are holders of masters and Ph.D. degrees. They have impressive academic records, besides being native English speakers.

2. Top Quality Papers: Our customers are always guaranteed of papers that exceed their expectations. All our writers have +5 years of experience. This implies that all papers are written by individuals who are experts in their fields. In addition, the quality team reviews all the papers before sending them to the customers.

3. Plagiarism-Free Papers: All papers provided by Eminence Papers are written from scratch. Appropriate referencing and citation of key information are followed. Plagiarism checkers are used by the Quality assurance team and our editors just to double-check that there are no instances of plagiarism.

4. Timely Delivery: Time wasted is equivalent to a failed dedication and commitment. Eminence Papers are known for the timely delivery of any pending customer orders. Customers are well informed of the progress of their papers to ensure they keep track of what the writer is providing before the final draft is sent for grading.

5. Affordable Prices: Our prices are fairly structured to fit in all groups. Any customer willing to place their assignments with us can do so at very affordable prices. In addition, our customers enjoy regular discounts and bonuses.

6. 24/7 Customer Support: At Eminence Papers, we have put in place a team of experts who answer all customer inquiries promptly. The best part is the ever-availability of the team. Customers can make inquiries anytime.