You have the freedom, in this section, to chose a country as a second location (although, I will ask you to pick a country that is sufficiently different on at least two of Hofstedes dimensions from the U.S.). In this section, you will need to point out how your recommendations will differ for this location as compared to the U.S. location. This could range from slight alterations to your U.S. plan to a completely different approach. Be sure to explain why this non-U.S. plan is different. If you recall from our discussion on feedback systems, for example, if my recommendation for the U.S. location were to have employees have a hand in designing the feedback system, I would have to change that recommendation if the secondary location were in a country with a very high-power distance. I would simply point out this key cultural difference and why it necessitates this shift in strategy.
This is not an invitation to explain the entire Hofstede model or to write a grand soliloquy on cultural differences (I dont want to see page space devoted to defining ALL of Hofstedes dimensions). Just simply point out that the secondary location has a different national culture that presents unique challenges.
You should be able to write this section in about one page to one-and-a-half pages. It is not a completely new set of recommendations. It is just taking your part 3 plan and making some key changes. So, dont re-write all of part 3 as if this is a new set of recommendations.
Please I included the part 3 plans and I think a country we could as a second location are China or Russia.
"Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, guaranteeing you A results."